Waqf Act Amendment and Muslim Representation: BJP, SP, and AIMIM Clash at 'Panchayat Aajtak'
### Key Points of Contention:
* **Waqf Property and 'Waqf by User':** AIMIM's Shaukat Ali strongly criticized the central government’s move to amend the Waqf law, alleging that removing the 'Waqf by User' provision threatens the status of centuries-old mosques and graveyards. He accused the government of attempting to seize these religious properties.
* **Government Stance:** BJP’s Mohsin Raza countered that the amendments aim to introduce transparency and protect these properties from past mismanagement and illegal occupations. Regarding the inclusion of non-Muslim members in the Waqf Board, he argued it was a measure to ensure accountability and professional collaboration within a statutory body.
* **Political Representation:** When questioned about representation for the Muslim population, the BJP reiterated its focus on 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas,' claiming that its welfare schemes benefit all citizens regardless of religious affiliation.
* **Electoral Dynamics:** The Samajwadi Party emphasized that government welfare schemes are funded by taxpayer money, asserting that every citizen has an equal right to them. Dr. MH Khan expressed confidence that the SP would secure a significant victory in 2027, building on their performance in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.
### Heated Exchanges:
Shaukat Ali challenged the BJP over the demolition of an Idgah in Sambhal, questioning the legality and intent behind the action if the land was designated as a graveyard. Meanwhile, the BJP maintained that its policy focuses on 100% of the population, refusing to categorize voters by religion, while the Samajwadi Party positioned itself as an inclusive force for all castes and religions.
